{"schema_version":"1.3","slug":"economic-industrial","title":"Economic & Industrial Statecraft","status":"live","current_through":"2026-08-08","strapline":"Power must be financed, produced, moved, protected, and regenerated.","primary_question":"Can the United States and participating partners create leverage, absorb coercion, and regenerate strategic capacity at an acceptable cost?","boundary":"A current, public-source diagnosis of U.S. and partner leverage relative to major strategic competitors. It is not a forecast, an investment recommendation, or a single economic-power ranking.","axis":{"left":"PRC advantage","center":"Mixed / contested","right":"U.S. / partner advantage","note":"Positions are ordinal category anchors for separate structural systems, not measured scores and not components of a composite index."},"benchmark":"The ability to produce strategic effects in prolonged competition while preserving domestic and coalition capacity.","bottom_line":"The United States and its partners retain exceptional financial reach, frontier innovation, energy resources, and coalition market power. China holds formidable advantages in manufacturing scale, processing concentration, and several physical supply chains. The decisive contest is delivery: whether either side can turn nominal assets and policy announcements into durable output, coordinated leverage, and adaptation faster than the other can route around them.","diagnosis":[{"label":"Leverage","call":"Strong but conditional","tone":"partner","summary":"Dollar networks, advanced technology ecosystems, large allied markets, and rule-setting institutions create outsized U.S. and partner leverage.","constraint":"Financial leverage depends on institutional confidence; technology controls depend on foreign availability, enforcement, and repeated updating."},{"label":"Exposure","call":"Concentrated and asymmetric","tone":"competitor","summary":"China's manufacturing depth and dominance in numerous mineral-processing and component chains create chokepoints that cannot be replaced quickly.","constraint":"Exposure is product- and stage-specific. Gross trade balances conceal whether the binding dependency is a mine, refinery, tool, software layer, port, or skilled workforce."},{"label":"Delivery","call":"Contested","tone":"contested","summary":"Large public and private commitments are now moving into fabs, mines, logistics, energy, and industrial capacity.","constraint":"Announcements are not operating capacity. Milestones, qualification, throughput, workforce, permitting, offtake, and coalition implementation decide the result."}],"method":{"name":"Instrument-to-outcome chain","steps":[{"name":"Objective","question":"What observable behavior, capacity, or dependency is supposed to change?"},{"name":"Instrument","question":"Which tool is used: finance, trade, controls, procurement, subsidy, stockpile, standard, or coalition agreement?"},{"name":"Transmission","question":"Through which firms, prices, technologies, jurisdictions, and supply-chain stages should the tool work?"},{"name":"Adaptation","question":"How can the target, market, or coalition substitute, evade, delay, retaliate, or absorb the pressure?"},{"name":"Outcome","question":"Did behavior or usable capacity change, on what timeline, and with what confidence?"},{"name":"Cost","question":"What did the sender, partners, firms, workers, and third countries pay—and is the policy sustainable?"}],"rules":["No composite economic-power score. A financial advantage cannot cancel a mineral chokepoint or an industrial bottleneck.","Separate commitments, obligated funds, disbursements, construction, qualification, output, and sustained throughput.","Separate instrument activity from strategic effect. Designations, tariffs, controls, and agreements are inputs until behavior or capacity changes.","Record substitution, evasion, retaliation, leakage, and coalition exceptions as part of the causal chain.","Show an explicit unknown when public evidence cannot establish an outcome."]},"drivers":[{"id":"EI-D01","title":"Financial networks & monetary reach","call":"U.S. / partner advantage","axis_label":"U.S. / partner edge","axis_position":75,"tone":"partner","confidence":"High","judgment":"The dollar remains the leading reserve, funding, and cross-border transaction currency, giving the United States unusually broad—but not costless—financial reach.","evidence":["The IMF reported the dollar at 57.13% of disclosed foreign-exchange reserves in 2026 Q1, versus 20.03% for the euro and 1.99% for the renminbi.","The Federal Reserve's 2026 review still describes the dollar as the dominant currency in official reserves, international debt, loans, and cross-border payments.","OFAC's active program architecture and data services make access to U.S.-linked finance a scalable policy instrument."],"limits":["Reserve shares move with valuation as well as active allocation; quarter-to-quarter changes are not a referendum on policy.","Overuse, unpredictable exceptions, fiscal risk, or weakened institutional confidence can increase diversification incentives.","Financial pressure can impose costs without compelling the target's preferred political behavior."],"watch":"Reserve composition after valuation adjustment; dollar funding shares; payment-routing changes; coalition participation; sanctioned-network substitution; measurable target behavior.","source_ids":["IMF-COFER-2026Q1","FED-DOLLAR-2026","BEA-IIP-2026Q1","OFAC-PROGRAMS-2026","GAO-RUSSIA-2025","PRC-PBOC-RMB-2025"],"evidence_role":"comparative_mechanism","institutional_family":["Federal Reserve Board","International Monetary Fund","People's Bank of China","U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis","U.S. Government Accountability Office","U.S. Treasury, OFAC"],"comparative_observability":"substantial","fact_confidence":"High","comparative_confidence":"High"},{"id":"EI-D02","title":"Manufacturing scale & production depth","call":"PRC advantage in scale","axis_label":"PRC edge","axis_position":25,"tone":"competitor","confidence":"High","judgment":"China's breadth, supplier density, and manufacturing scale create advantages in speed, learning, cost, and the ability to concentrate production across multiple stages.","evidence":["UNIDO's 2025 yearbook describes the continuing structural shift of global manufacturing toward Asia and Oceania.","UNIDO reported manufacturing production rose 1.2% and exports 3.5% in 2026 Q1, with Asia and the Pacific leading production and trade.","NSF estimates China led global semiconductor production by value added in 2024 at 30%, followed by Taiwan at 23%, the United States at 19%, and South Korea at 11%."],"limits":["Aggregate manufacturing value added does not reveal quality, surge capacity, yield, supplier substitutability, or access to frontier tools.","Scale can coexist with imported energy, technology, financial, or market dependencies.","Capacity is not automatically available for a strategic objective; ownership, contracts, location, qualification, and transport matter."],"watch":"Product-level output and yield; supplier density; machine-tool and industrial-robot stocks; order backlogs; capacity utilization; lead time from funding to qualified throughput.","source_ids":["UNIDO-YEARBOOK-2025","UNIDO-Q1-2026","NSF-SE-2026","CENSUS-AIES-2026","PRC-NBS-2025","PRC-MIIT-SHIP-2025","PRC-MIIT-PV-2024"],"evidence_role":"comparative_mechanism","institutional_family":["National Science Board / NSF","PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology","PRC National Bureau of Statistics","U.S. Census Bureau","UN Industrial Development Organization"],"comparative_observability":"substantial","fact_confidence":"High","comparative_confidence":"High"},{"id":"EI-D03","title":"Critical inputs, processing & substitution","call":"PRC advantage in processing","axis_label":"PRC edge","axis_position":25,"tone":"competitor","confidence":"High","judgment":"The most acute vulnerabilities sit in concentrated refining, processing, and specialized intermediate products—not simply in where ore is mined.","evidence":["IEA found refining concentration reached new records in 2025; excluding rare earths, the leading country's average share reached 72%.","IEA identifies China as the top refiner for most key energy and strategic minerals, while new export controls have converted concentration into operational disruption.","USGS's 2026 commodity summaries provide the traceable federal baseline for U.S. production, consumption, import sources, and net import reliance."],"limits":["Mineral labels conceal grade, chemistry, refining route, qualification, by-product economics, and end-use specificity.","Announced mines without refining, magnet, cathode, wafer, or component capacity can move the bottleneck rather than remove it.","Substitution may impose performance, certification, time, and cost penalties."],"watch":"Stage-specific concentration; qualified non-dominant-supplier capacity; time-to-substitute; inventories; offtake coverage; price spreads inside and outside the dominant market.","source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026","USGS-MCS-2026","OECD-SECURITY-2025","PRC-MOFCOM-GA-GE-2023","PRC-MOFCOM-REE-2025","PRC-MOFCOM-GRAPHITE-2023","PRC-EXPORT-LAW-2020"],"evidence_role":"comparative_mechanism","institutional_family":["International Energy Agency","National People's Congress of the PRC / PRC Ministry of Commerce","Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs","U.S. Geological Survey"],"comparative_observability":"substantial","fact_confidence":"High","comparative_confidence":"High"},{"id":"EI-D04","title":"Innovation, technology chokepoints & diffusion","call":"Split advantage","axis_label":"Mixed","axis_position":50,"tone":"contested","confidence":"Medium-high","judgment":"The United States and close partners retain major advantages in frontier research, high-impact patents, software, design, and specialized tools; China increasingly leads in scale, diffusion, publication volume, patents in selected fields, and manufacturing learning.","evidence":["NSF reports U.S. strengths in highly cited research, venture-backed innovation, high-technology services, and high-impact patents.","The same report finds China produced three-quarters of AI international-priority patents in 2024 and led semiconductor production value added.","Current U.S. export rules retain end-use and end-user controls for advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing while licensing policy continues to evolve."],"limits":["Patent and publication counts do not measure deployable capability, and citation-based measures lag.","Controls can slow access while also accelerating substitution, rerouting, indigenous investment, and design changes.","A chokepoint is only durable if allies control alternatives, enforcement is credible, and the technology frontier keeps moving."],"watch":"Foreign availability; controlled-item performance thresholds; enforcement and diversion; indigenous substitutes; partner alignment; research-to-production cycle time.","source_ids":["NSF-SE-2026","BIS-EAR-744-2026","BIS-CHIPS-POLICY-2026","GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024","PRC-FYP14-2021","PRC-IC-POLICY-2020","PRC-AI-PLUS-2025"],"evidence_role":"split_or_inconclusive","institutional_family":["National Science Board / NSF","PRC State Council","PRC State Council / National People's Congress","U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security","U.S. Government Accountability Office"],"comparative_observability":"partial","fact_confidence":"Medium-high","comparative_confidence":"Medium-high"},{"id":"EI-D05","title":"Energy, logistics & maritime movement","call":"Mixed system","axis_label":"Mixed","axis_position":50,"tone":"contested","confidence":"Medium-high","judgment":"U.S. energy production, allied logistics networks, and adaptable markets provide resilience, but maritime transport, shipbuilding, ports, fuel cycles, and chokepoints expose major concentration and disruption risks.","evidence":["UNCTAD estimates roughly 80% of world merchandise-trade volume moves by sea and documents chronic rerouting, higher costs, and concentrated ownership and registration.","MARAD's 2026 strategy study warns that U.S. commercial shipping, mariner, and shipbuilding capacity may be inadequate for defense and economic-security needs.","Europe's reduction in Russian gas dependence demonstrates that infrastructure, alternative supply, storage, demand adjustment, and law can change exposure over several years."],"limits":["National output is not equivalent to deliverable supply if transport, terminals, insurance, processing, or contracts fail.","Commercial efficiency can depend on concentrated nodes that become single points of failure under crisis conditions.","Resilience investments can raise peacetime costs and shift exposure to new routes or suppliers."],"watch":"Route diversity; port dwell and recovery time; U.S.-flag and allied lift; shipyard throughput; energy storage; spare capacity; insurance and payment access.","source_ids":["UNCTAD-MARITIME-2025","WORLDBANK-LPI-2025","MARAD-STRATEGY-2026","EU-ENERGY-2026","IEA-GAS-2026","PRC-NEA-RENEW-2025","PRC-MIIT-SHIP-2025","PRC-GACC-TRADE-2025H1"],"evidence_role":"split_or_inconclusive","institutional_family":["Council of the European Union","International Energy Agency","PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology","PRC National Energy Administration","PRC State Council / General Administration of Customs","U.S. Maritime Administration","UN Trade and Development","World Bank"],"comparative_observability":"partial","fact_confidence":"Medium-high","comparative_confidence":"Medium-high"},{"id":"EI-D06","title":"Coalition market power & coordinated instruments","call":"Potential U.S. / partner advantage","axis_label":"Potential partner edge","axis_position":68.75,"tone":"partner","confidence":"Medium","judgment":"The combined markets, technology positions, finance, energy, and production of U.S. partners can outweigh any single economy, but only when commitments become interoperable rules, shared enforcement, usable supply, and crisis action.","evidence":["IPEF's Supply Chain Agreement created a council, crisis-response network, and labor advisory board across a major Indo-Pacific economic grouping.","Semiconductor, sanctions, energy, and supply-chain policies all demonstrate that jurisdictional coverage changes effectiveness.","Europe's energy shift shows coalition-scale demand, infrastructure, regulation, and finance can reconfigure dependencies."],"limits":["Different threat perceptions, domestic costs, legal systems, election cycles, and commercial interests produce exemptions and lag.","Signed agreements and joint statements are not evidence of crisis performance.","Overly broad restrictions can reduce participation and shift trade through non-participants."],"watch":"Coverage of critical jurisdictions; implementation lag; common definitions; exercise performance; exception volume; enforcement resources; partner cost-sharing.","source_ids":["COMMERCE-IPEF-2024","EU-ENERGY-2026","GAO-RUSSIA-2025","GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024","PRC-BRI-2023"],"evidence_role":"comparative_mechanism","institutional_family":["Council of the European Union","PRC State Council Information Office","U.S. Department of Commerce","U.S. Government Accountability Office"],"comparative_observability":"partial","fact_confidence":"Medium","comparative_confidence":"Medium"},{"id":"EI-D07","title":"Capital, workforce, permitting & project delivery","call":"Contested delivery","axis_label":"Contested","axis_position":50,"tone":"contested","confidence":"Medium-high","comparative_observability":"limited","fact_confidence":"High","comparative_confidence":"Medium-high","judgment":"The United States can mobilize deep public and private capital, but usable capacity arrives only after projects complete permitting, construction, equipment installation, workforce preparation, qualification, customer commitments, and sustained production.","evidence":["GAO recorded $30.9 billion in direct CHIPS incentives and $5.5 billion in loans across 40 projects as of July 2025.","At that point, firms had reported completing 24 of 161 milestones and one leading-edge facility had been certified complete.","IEA reported about $65 billion in advanced-economy public-finance commitments for critical minerals in 2025 while warning of a gap between commitments and disbursements."],"limits":["Headline investment totals can mix new, reannounced, contingent, tax-supported, loan, and private capital.","Nominal capacity does not establish yield, operating cost, workforce readiness, product qualification, or sustained output.","Policy instability raises financing costs and can strand complementary infrastructure."],"watch":"Milestones completed; dollars disbursed; construction and qualification dates; workforce fill; yield; utilization; customer offtake; unit-cost gap to incumbent suppliers.","source_ids":["GAO-CHIPS-2025","IEA-MINERALS-2026","CENSUS-AIES-2026","NSF-SE-2026","PRC-NBS-2025","PRC-FYP14-2021"],"evidence_role":"split_or_inconclusive","institutional_family":["International Energy Agency","National Science Board / NSF","PRC National Bureau of Statistics","PRC State Council / National People's Congress","U.S. Census Bureau","U.S. Government Accountability Office"]},{"id":"EI-D08","title":"Coercion resilience, adaptation & policy learning","call":"Contested","axis_label":"Contested","axis_position":50,"tone":"contested","confidence":"Medium-high","judgment":"Economic coercion rarely acts on a static target. Reserves, rerouting, substitution, state support, third-country trade, shadow networks, and political tolerance can blunt pressure; sender coalitions also learn and adapt.","evidence":["GAO found Russia's 2022 growth was about six percentage points below its counterfactual but not statistically different from expected growth in 2023 and 2024.","GAO also found export controls hindered but did not prevent Russian access to critical technology, and shadow-fleet activity limited the oil price cap.","The EU cut Russian gas from 45% of imports in 2021 to 12% in 2025, showing that exposed economies can reconfigure supply when policy, infrastructure, and market incentives align."],"limits":["War, commodity prices, fiscal stimulus, exchange controls, and sanctions occur together, making causal attribution difficult.","Macroeconomic growth can mask degraded productivity, composition, technology access, household welfare, or future capacity.","Resilience for one sector or time horizon can create higher costs or a different dependency elsewhere."],"watch":"Evasion networks; rerouting premium; substitution quality; inventory burn; fiscal cost; coalition retention; target behavior; sender exit criteria and learning cycles.","source_ids":["GAO-RUSSIA-2025","EU-ENERGY-2026","IEA-GAS-2026","OECD-SECURITY-2025","PRC-EXPORT-LAW-2020","PRC-UEL-2020"],"evidence_role":"split_or_inconclusive","institutional_family":["Council of the European Union","International Energy Agency","National People's Congress of the PRC / PRC Ministry of Commerce","Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","PRC Ministry of Commerce","U.S. Government Accountability Office"],"comparative_observability":"partial","fact_confidence":"Medium-high","comparative_confidence":"Medium-high"}],"cases":[{"id":"EI-C01","title":"Russia sanctions, export controls & the oil price cap","objective":"Raise the cost of aggression, constrain access to finance and technology, and reduce energy revenue while limiting global supply disruption.","instruments":["Asset freezes","Financial sanctions","Export controls","Oil price cap","Coalition enforcement"],"status":"Partial strategic effect","tone":"mixed","judgment":"The campaign imposed real costs and technology friction but did not compel near-term policy reversal; adaptation and measurement gaps materially limited efficacy.","observations":["GAO estimated a large 2022 growth effect but did not find statistically different growth in 2023–24.","The price cap likely helped preserve export volume while reducing revenue, but the shadow fleet and routing alternatives weakened leverage.","Export controls hindered access to U.S. military-relevant technology without fully preventing acquisition."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Financial restrictions, technology denial, and the price cap were intended to reduce access, revenue, and war-supporting capacity while preserving global supply."},{"stage":"Adaptation / leakage","text":"Fiscal mobilization, rerouting, transshipment, alternative suppliers, and the shadow fleet absorbed or bypassed part of the pressure."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"The campaign imposed measurable costs and technology friction, but public evidence does not show near-term policy reversal and later macroeconomic effects are harder to isolate."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"The coalition balanced pressure against energy-market disruption and enforcement burden; a consolidated public cost series is not available."}],"uncertainty":"The invasion, fiscal mobilization, commodity prices, capital controls, sanctions, and export controls are simultaneous; public evidence cannot cleanly isolate each instrument.","what_changes_the_call":"Clear outcome targets, item-level denial and substitution data, verified revenue effects, coalition leakage measures, and evidence of changed Russian capacity or behavior.","source_ids":["GAO-RUSSIA-2025","OFAC-PROGRAMS-2026","FED-DOLLAR-2026"]},{"id":"EI-C02","title":"Advanced-semiconductor controls","objective":"Limit access to advanced computing and manufacturing capabilities with military and intelligence applications while preserving the innovation base.","instruments":["Item controls","End-use controls","Entity restrictions","Foreign-produced item rules","Licensing","Partner alignment"],"status":"Chokepoint under adaptation","tone":"contested","judgment":"The control architecture reaches genuine chokepoints, but its durable effect depends on foreign availability, enforcement, threshold updates, partner coverage, and the balance between denial and ecosystem revenue.","observations":["BIS retains supercomputer and semiconductor-manufacturing end-use restrictions in the current EAR.","Licensing policy changed again in January 2026 for specified advanced chips, demonstrating that the instrument is actively recalibrated.","GAO documented implementation and compliance challenges but did not establish a complete outcome measure."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Item, end-use, entity, foreign-produced-item, and licensing controls constrain access to advanced computing and semiconductor-manufacturing capability."},{"stage":"Adaptation / leakage","text":"Diversion, foreign availability, threshold workarounds, stockpiling, efficiency gains, and indigenous substitution reduce durable denial."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"The architecture reaches real chokepoints and creates friction, but no complete public series measures the resulting military-relevant capability loss."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"The policy trades denial against partner alignment, compliance burden, ecosystem revenue, and the innovation base; the net cost is not comprehensively measured."}],"uncertainty":"Public data do not provide a complete counterfactual for Chinese capability, diversion, performance degradation, indigenous substitution, or lost U.S. innovation funding.","what_changes_the_call":"A recurring, public foreign-availability and outcome assessment that links controlled performance, diversion, indigenous alternatives, and military-relevant capability.","source_ids":["BIS-EAR-744-2026","BIS-CHIPS-POLICY-2026","GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024","NSF-SE-2026","PRC-IC-POLICY-2020","PRC-FYP14-2021"]},{"id":"EI-C03","title":"Critical-mineral export controls & diversification","objective":"Use concentrated processing as leverage—or reduce exposure to that leverage—across high-technology, energy, automotive, aerospace, and defense chains.","instruments":["Export licensing","Stockpiles","Public finance","Offtake","Allied sourcing","Substitution and recycling"],"status":"Exposure revealed; diversification incomplete","tone":"competitor","judgment":"Recent restrictions made processing concentration operationally consequential. Diversification is progressing in selected stages, but midstream and downstream gaps, higher costs, and slow qualification remain decisive.","observations":["IEA reports the number of mineral tariff codes subject to Chinese controls has tripled since 2023.","Refining concentration increased in 2025 even as rare-earth diversification showed targeted policy can move a specific stage.","Public-finance commitments expanded rapidly, but disbursement and balanced value-chain delivery lag."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Export licensing converts processing concentration into leverage, while finance, offtake, stockpiles, recycling, and substitution seek to reduce exposure."},{"stage":"Adaptation / leakage","text":"Firms draw inventories, reroute trade, qualify substitutes, and redesign products, but grade, chemistry, and customer certification constrain speed."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"Controls made concentration operationally consequential; selected diversification is real, but qualified midstream and downstream alternatives remain incomplete."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"Diversification and substitution can impose higher prices, performance penalties, financing risk, and long qualification timelines."}],"uncertainty":"Commercial inventories, contract terms, product grades, license approvals, and firm-level substitutions are often proprietary.","what_changes_the_call":"Verified qualified throughput outside the dominant supplier across refining and component stages, shorter substitution times, transparent inventories, and durable offtake.","source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026","USGS-MCS-2026","OECD-SECURITY-2025","PRC-MOFCOM-GA-GE-2023","PRC-MOFCOM-REE-2025","PRC-MOFCOM-GRAPHITE-2023","PRC-EXPORT-LAW-2020"]},{"id":"EI-C04","title":"CHIPS incentives: money to qualified output","objective":"Restore leading-edge and specialized semiconductor capacity, strengthen suppliers and packaging, and reduce geographic concentration.","instruments":["Grants","Loans","Tax incentives","Milestone payments","Workforce support","R&D infrastructure"],"status":"Large pipeline; early delivery evidence","tone":"partner","judgment":"The portfolio is strategically broad and one leading-edge facility had reached certification by mid-2025, but most milestones and completion dates remained ahead. The program should be judged by qualified output, not award totals.","observations":["GAO counted 40 projects across 19 companies covering materials through packaging.","Nearly 40% of projects were intended for leading-edge logic, with Commerce estimating a move from 0% U.S. share in 2022 to 20% by 2030.","Only 24 of 161 milestones had completion reports as of July 2025, so the dominant evidence was still prospective."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Grants, loans, tax incentives, milestone payments, workforce support, and R&D infrastructure lower the cost and risk of building domestic capacity."},{"stage":"Adaptation / friction","text":"Permitting, construction, equipment installation, workforce fill, qualification, yield, customer demand, and policy renegotiation separate awards from output."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"The portfolio is broad, 24 of 161 milestones were reported complete, and one leading-edge facility was certified complete by mid-2025."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"Public support combines unlike grants, loans, tax incentives, and private commitments; comparable lifetime cost and competitiveness remain unknown."}],"uncertainty":"Awards, company commitments, later renegotiations, tax support, and private capital are not directly comparable; future yield and cost competitiveness are unknown.","what_changes_the_call":"On-time construction, equipment installation, product qualification, sustained yield and utilization, workforce fill, supplier localization, and transparent milestone reporting.","source_ids":["GAO-CHIPS-2025","NSF-SE-2026","CENSUS-AIES-2026"]},{"id":"EI-C05","title":"Europe's exit from Russian gas dependence","objective":"Reduce an exploitable energy dependency without losing security of supply or coalition political cohesion.","instruments":["Diversified imports","LNG infrastructure","Storage","Demand adjustment","Renewables","Binding phase-out rules"],"status":"Substantial resilience gain","tone":"partner","judgment":"This is a strong case of an exposed coalition changing physical supply and law together: Russian gas fell from 45% of EU imports in 2021 to 12% in 2025, with a binding phase-out now underway.","observations":["The EU reduced Russian gas volumes from 152 bcm in 2021 to 36 bcm in 2025.","IEA reports Russian piped deliveries to the EU fell 90% between 2021 and 2025.","The 2026 regulation phases out remaining LNG and pipeline contracts on staged timelines through 2027."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Alternative imports, LNG infrastructure, storage, demand adjustment, renewables, and binding phase-out rules changed the physical and legal supply system."},{"stage":"Adaptation / friction","text":"Consumers, firms, and governments absorbed price, subsidy, infrastructure, and demand adjustments while suppliers and routes shifted."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"Russian gas fell from 45% to 12% of EU imports, physical volumes dropped sharply, and a staged legal phase-out is underway."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"The resilience gain carried price, subsidy, industrial-demand, infrastructure, and replacement-dependency costs that are not consolidated here."}],"uncertainty":"The transition involved price, subsidy, industrial-demand, infrastructure, and third-country effects; resilience gains do not imply zero cost.","what_changes_the_call":"Secure completion of the phase-out without emergency reversal, persistent supplier diversity, manageable industrial costs, and no replacement with an equally concentrated dependency.","source_ids":["EU-ENERGY-2026","IEA-GAS-2026"]},{"id":"EI-C06","title":"IPEF supply-chain institutions","objective":"Create standing Indo-Pacific mechanisms to map critical sectors, coordinate resilience projects, and respond collectively to disruptions.","instruments":["Supply Chain Council","Crisis Response Network","Exercises","Information sharing","Business matching","Workforce cooperation"],"status":"Institution built; performance unproven","tone":"mixed","judgment":"The agreement created useful standing bodies and a crisis channel. Public evidence remains too thin to judge whether they can deliver alternative supply or coordinated action under a major disruption.","observations":["The Supply Chain Agreement entered into force in February 2024 and established three implementation bodies.","The design includes mapping, simulations, emergency communication, business matching, and alternative logistics coordination.","A signed architecture is an input; the missing evidence is stress-test performance and delivery against named sector vulnerabilities."],"causal_chain":[{"stage":"Transmission","text":"Standing councils, a crisis-response network, information sharing, exercises, and business matching are intended to shorten coordination and supply-response time."},{"stage":"Adaptation / friction","text":"Different legal authorities, commercial exposure, domestic costs, information limits, and partner priorities can slow or narrow collective action."},{"stage":"Observed outcome","text":"The agreement and implementation bodies exist, but public evidence does not yet show faster crisis response or alternative supply delivered under stress."},{"stage":"Sender / partner cost","text":"Partner-specific commitments, exercise burdens, project costs, and distribution of adjustment costs are not comprehensively public."}],"uncertainty":"Detailed vulnerability maps, exercise findings, response times, investment pipelines, and partner-specific commitments are not comprehensively public.","what_changes_the_call":"Published sector work plans, exercise after-action results, response-time standards, funded projects, and evidence the network solved an actual disruption.","source_ids":["COMMERCE-IPEF-2024","OECD-SECURITY-2025"]}],"indicators":[{"id":"EI-I01","stage":"System leverage","name":"Dollar share of disclosed reserves","baseline":"57.13%","as_of":"2026 Q1","direction":"Broadly stable; valuation-sensitive","why":"Tracks one foundation of financial reach, not sanction effectiveness by itself.","update":"Quarterly","measurement":{"type":"Stock share","unit":"Percent of allocated reserves","numerator":"Allocated official foreign-exchange reserves held in U.S. dollars","denominator":"Total allocated official foreign-exchange reserves reported to COFER","treatment":"Current-value composition; exchange rates can change shares without transactions","revision_policy":"Replace with each IMF quarterly vintage and retain the observation date"},"source_ids":["IMF-COFER-2026Q1"]},{"id":"EI-I02","stage":"System exposure","name":"U.S. net international investment position","baseline":"-$21.27 trillion","as_of":"2026 Q1","direction":"Large external balance-sheet exposure","why":"Provides context on deep capital-market integration and valuation exposure.","update":"Quarterly","measurement":{"type":"Net financial-position stock","unit":"Current U.S. dollars","numerator":"U.S.-owned foreign financial assets minus foreign-owned U.S. financial assets","denominator":"No denominator in the headline level; GDP and gross-asset ratios are separate measures","treatment":"Nominal market-value position affected by transactions, prices, and exchange rates","revision_policy":"Use the latest BEA quarterly vintage and identify revisions"},"source_ids":["BEA-IIP-2026Q1"]},{"id":"EI-I03","stage":"Industrial structure","name":"Semiconductor production value-added share","baseline":"China 30% · Taiwan 23% · U.S. 19% · South Korea 11%","as_of":"2024","direction":"Geographically concentrated","why":"Shows production weight, while remaining distinct from leading-edge node capacity.","update":"Annual","measurement":{"type":"Annual value-added share","unit":"Percent of global semiconductor manufacturing value added","numerator":"Economy-level semiconductor manufacturing value added in the NSF estimate","denominator":"Global semiconductor manufacturing value added in the same estimate","treatment":"Source-defined value added; not wafer starts, yield, or leading-edge-node capacity","revision_policy":"Update only with a comparable NSF vintage and preserve methodological breaks"},"source_ids":["NSF-SE-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I04","stage":"Innovation","name":"U.S. R&D intensity","baseline":"3.4% of GDP","as_of":"2024 / latest harmonized estimate","direction":"High but contested","why":"Measures input intensity; translation to production must be tested separately.","update":"Annual","measurement":{"type":"Annual intensity ratio","unit":"Percent of GDP","numerator":"U.S. gross domestic expenditures on research and development","denominator":"U.S. gross domestic product for the harmonized observation year","treatment":"Source-defined ratio; measures inputs rather than innovation outcomes","revision_policy":"Use the latest harmonized NSF vintage and disclose underlying-series revisions"},"source_ids":["NSF-SE-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I05","stage":"Innovation","name":"China share of AI international-priority patents","baseline":"75%","as_of":"2024","direction":"High and rising","why":"Signals scale in protected invention; quality and deployment require separate evidence.","update":"Annual with lag","measurement":{"type":"Patent-family share","unit":"Percent of AI international-priority patent families","numerator":"AI international-priority patent families attributed to China","denominator":"Worldwide AI international-priority patent families in the cited NSF series","treatment":"Counts protected invention families; does not weight quality, citation impact, or deployment","revision_policy":"Update with comparable annual vintages and retain the publication lag"},"source_ids":["NSF-SE-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I06","stage":"Input concentration","name":"Average top-refiner share, key minerals excluding rare earths","baseline":"72%","as_of":"2025","direction":"Up from 70% in 2023","why":"Tracks whether diversification changes the actual processing bottleneck.","update":"Annual","measurement":{"type":"Basket concentration share","unit":"Average percent share","numerator":"Leading refining country's share for each mineral in the IEA basket","denominator":"Global refined output for each covered mineral, averaged excluding rare earths","treatment":"IEA basket and stage definitions; the average can hide material-specific variation","revision_policy":"Update with each IEA outlook and preserve basket or methodology changes"},"source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I07","stage":"Coercive exposure","name":"Mineral tariff codes under Chinese export controls","baseline":"Three times the 2023 count","as_of":"2026 report","direction":"Expanded","why":"Shows expansion of controlled product scope; license approvals and realized shortages remain separate.","update":"Event-driven","measurement":{"type":"Policy-scope index","unit":"Multiple of the 2023 tariff-code count","numerator":"Mineral tariff codes covered by Chinese export-control measures in the cited report","denominator":"Comparable covered tariff-code count in 2023","treatment":"Counts formal product scope, not license denials, shipment disruption, or economic effect","revision_policy":"Revise after an implemented control change or comparable IEA recount"},"source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I08","stage":"Diversification finance","name":"Advanced-economy public finance commitments for critical minerals","baseline":"About $65 billion","as_of":"2025","direction":"More than four times 2023","why":"Measures commitment; disbursement and qualified output are the delivery tests.","update":"Annual","measurement":{"type":"Cumulative public-finance commitment","unit":"Nominal U.S. dollars","numerator":"Advanced-economy public-finance commitments identified by the IEA","denominator":"No denominator; this is a headline cumulative commitment level","treatment":"May combine unlike instruments; does not equal disbursement, qualification, or output","revision_policy":"Update with each IEA inventory and identify scope changes where disclosed"},"source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I09","stage":"Project delivery","name":"CHIPS milestones reported complete","baseline":"24 of 161","as_of":"July 2025","direction":"Early portfolio stage","why":"Separates award announcements from delivery.","update":"At each GAO or Commerce portfolio release","measurement":{"type":"Unweighted milestone completion count","unit":"Completed milestones out of total contractual milestones","numerator":"Milestones that recipients reported complete","denominator":"161 milestones in the reviewed portfolio, whether or not all were due by the cutoff","treatment":"Milestones differ in value and timing; completion is not equivalent to qualified output","revision_policy":"Replace only with a comparable portfolio release and preserve the reporting cutoff"},"source_ids":["GAO-CHIPS-2025"]},{"id":"EI-I10","stage":"Project delivery","name":"CHIPS-funded projects certified complete","baseline":"1 leading-edge facility","as_of":"June 2025","direction":"First completion","why":"Marks the first completed facility; product qualification, yield, utilization, and cost remain to be assessed.","update":"At each portfolio release","measurement":{"type":"Certified facility count","unit":"Facilities","numerator":"CHIPS-supported leading-edge facilities certified complete","denominator":"No comparable completed-versus-due denominator is published in this headline","treatment":"Certification is not product qualification, sustained yield, utilization, or cost competitiveness","revision_policy":"Update with GAO or Commerce certification records and retain facility scope"},"source_ids":["GAO-CHIPS-2025"]},{"id":"EI-I11","stage":"Energy resilience","name":"Russian share of EU gas imports","baseline":"12%","as_of":"2025","direction":"Down from 45% in 2021","why":"A physical dependency outcome rather than a policy-activity count.","update":"Annual / phase-out milestones","measurement":{"type":"Import-flow share","unit":"Percent of EU gas imports","numerator":"EU gas imports originating in Russia","denominator":"Total EU gas imports in the same period","treatment":"Physical import share; changes reflect Russian volumes and other-supplier volumes","revision_policy":"Update with comparable EU annual data and record legal milestones separately"},"source_ids":["EU-ENERGY-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I12","stage":"Energy resilience","name":"Russian piped-gas deliveries to the EU","baseline":"Down 90% from 2021","as_of":"2025","direction":"Sharp diversification","why":"Cross-checks the import-share measure with physical flow.","update":"Quarterly / annual","measurement":{"type":"Physical-flow change","unit":"Percent change from 2021","numerator":"Russian pipeline-gas volume delivered to the EU in the observation year","denominator":"Russian pipeline-gas volume delivered to the EU in 2021","treatment":"Pipeline flow only; excludes the separate LNG channel and total transition cost","revision_policy":"Use comparable IEA flow vintages and preserve the 2021 baseline"},"source_ids":["IEA-GAS-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I13","stage":"Maritime resilience","name":"U.S. oceangoing commercial ship construction","baseline":"Routinely 3–5 ships per year","as_of":"MARAD strategy study, 2026","direction":"Capacity constraint","why":"A concrete regeneration bottleneck distinct from port and naval capacity.","update":"Annual","measurement":{"type":"Annual production flow","unit":"Oceangoing commercial ships completed per year","numerator":"Qualifying oceangoing commercial ships constructed in the United States","denominator":"One calendar year; no tonnage or complexity weighting in the headline","treatment":"Hull count does not measure tonnage, vessel complexity, repair, or naval output","revision_policy":"Update with a comparable MARAD or official annual construction series"},"source_ids":["MARAD-STRATEGY-2026"]},{"id":"EI-I14","stage":"Campaign outcome","name":"Russia macroeconomic growth effect","baseline":"About -6 percentage points versus counterfactual in 2022; no statistically different result in 2023–24","as_of":"GAO analysis, 2025","direction":"Initial shock; adaptation","why":"Demonstrates why a campaign needs time-bounded outcome targets rather than designation totals.","update":"When a comparable causal estimate is published","measurement":{"type":"Model-estimated causal effect","unit":"Percentage-point difference in GDP growth","numerator":"Estimated observed-minus-counterfactual Russian GDP growth effect","denominator":"Model counterfactual for Russian growth absent the assessed shock package","treatment":"Not a raw growth rate or one-instrument estimate; later effects were not statistically different","revision_policy":"Update only with a comparable causal estimate and preserve uncertainty intervals"},"source_ids":["GAO-RUSSIA-2025"]},{"id":"EI-I15","stage":"Coalition delivery","name":"IPEF crisis-response performance","baseline":"No comprehensive public response-time or exercise-outcome series located","as_of":"2026-08-07","direction":"Unknown","why":"Without comparable response-time or exercise results, coalition crisis performance cannot yet be judged from public evidence.","update":"After exercises or activations","measurement":{"type":"Missing outcome series","unit":"Not yet defined from public evidence","numerator":"Observed response time, coordinated actions, or resolved supply shortfalls","denominator":"A comparable disruption or exercise baseline","treatment":"Meetings and agreements are inputs and are not substituted for performance observations","revision_policy":"Create a baseline only after a public exercise, activation, or after-action result"},"source_ids":["COMMERCE-IPEF-2024"]},{"id":"EI-I16","stage":"Control effectiveness","name":"Advanced-chip diversion and foreign availability","baseline":"No consolidated public outcome series located","as_of":"2026-08-07","direction":"Unknown","why":"The decisive control variable is access to comparable capability, not the number of rules.","update":"Annual outcome review","measurement":{"type":"Missing outcome series","unit":"Not yet defined from public evidence","numerator":"Observed access to diverted or foreign-available advanced-chip capability","denominator":"Controlled capability and a matched pre-control or comparator baseline","treatment":"Rule counts, licenses, seizures, and anecdotes are not combined into a synthetic measure","revision_policy":"Create or update only when a consolidated reproducible outcome series is public"},"source_ids":["BIS-EAR-744-2026","GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024"]}],"recommendations":[{"rank":1,"title":"Report progress from authorization through sustained output","action":"For every industrial initiative, report authorized, obligated, disbursed, under-construction, equipment-installed, qualified, operating, and sustained-throughput stages separately.","measure":"Share of projects and dollars at each stage, together with schedule variance and unit-cost evidence.","source_ids":["GAO-CHIPS-2025","IEA-MINERALS-2026"]},{"rank":2,"title":"Map the binding stage of each dependency","action":"Trace strategic products through mine or feedstock, processing, tools, components, qualification, logistics, maintenance, and workforce before assigning a vulnerability.","measure":"Concentration, time-to-substitute, qualified capacity, inventories, and recovery time at the actual bottleneck.","source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026","USGS-MCS-2026","OECD-SECURITY-2025"]},{"rank":3,"title":"Define the objective—and when to adjust or end the policy","action":"Define the target behavior or capacity, transmission mechanism, time horizon, acceptable sender cost, escalation bounds, and conditions for tightening, adapting, or ending the instrument.","measure":"Observed target behavior and capacity versus a stated counterfactual—not designations, tariffs, or license counts alone.","source_ids":["GAO-RUSSIA-2025","GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024"]},{"rank":4,"title":"Pre-negotiate coalition implementation","action":"Agree definitions, coverage, licensing, exceptions, enforcement information, burden sharing, and review schedules before a crisis.","measure":"Jurisdictional coverage, implementation lag, exception rate, enforcement capacity, and exercise response time.","source_ids":["COMMERCE-IPEF-2024","GAO-RUSSIA-2025"]},{"rank":5,"title":"Finance balanced chains and credible demand","action":"Pair upstream projects with processing, components, workforce, infrastructure, qualification, and long-duration offtake instead of financing isolated assets.","measure":"Qualified downstream capacity relative to upstream output, contracted demand, cost gap, and time to commercial throughput.","source_ids":["IEA-MINERALS-2026","GAO-CHIPS-2025"]},{"rank":6,"title":"Stress-test physical and institutional resilience","action":"Run disruption exercises against minerals, ports, energy, payments, cloud, components, and key logistics; publish bounded after-action findings.","measure":"Detection time, inventory days, alternate-route activation, output loss, recovery time, and unresolved authorities.","source_ids":["COMMERCE-IPEF-2024","UNCTAD-MARITIME-2025","WORLDBANK-LPI-2025"]},{"rank":7,"title":"Protect the foundations of financial leverage","action":"Treat rule of law, market depth, policy predictability, payments resilience, and coalition legitimacy as capabilities that require maintenance.","measure":"Reserve and funding shares adjusted for valuation, market liquidity, partner participation, and substitution behavior.","source_ids":["IMF-COFER-2026Q1","FED-DOLLAR-2026","BEA-IIP-2026Q1"]},{"rank":8,"title":"Track adaptation as aggressively as pressure","action":"Maintain a countermeasure register covering rerouting, front companies, technical substitution, fiscal support, retaliation, inventory use, and third-country intermediation.","measure":"Time and cost to route around the instrument, residual denial, sender leakage, and policy update cycle.","source_ids":["GAO-RUSSIA-2025","IEA-MINERALS-2026","BIS-EAR-744-2026"]}],"sources":[{"id":"IMF-COFER-2026Q1","agency":"International Monetary Fund","title":"Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves, 2026 Q1","date":"2026-07-01","kind":"Official data","url":"https://data.imf.org/en/news/imf%20data%20brief%20july%201","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"International Monetary Fund"},{"id":"FED-DOLLAR-2026","agency":"Federal Reserve Board","title":"Fifth Conference on the International Roles of the U.S. Dollar","date":"2026-07-16","kind":"Official research","url":"https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/fifth-conference-on-the-international-roles-of-the-u-s-dollar-stablecoins-digital-payments-and-the-ir-of-the-usd-20260716.html","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"Federal Reserve Board"},{"id":"BEA-IIP-2026Q1","agency":"U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis","title":"U.S. International Investment Position, 2026 Q1","date":"2026-06-24","kind":"Official data","url":"https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-investment/international-investment-position","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis"},{"id":"OFAC-PROGRAMS-2026","agency":"U.S. Treasury, OFAC","title":"Sanctions Programs and Country Information","date":"2026-07-24","kind":"Primary policy","url":"https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Treasury, OFAC"},{"id":"UNIDO-YEARBOOK-2025","agency":"UN Industrial Development Organization","title":"International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics 2025","date":"2025-11-20","kind":"Official statistics","url":"https://stat.unido.org/learning-center/international-yearbook-industrial-statistics-2025","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"UN Industrial Development Organization"},{"id":"UNIDO-Q1-2026","agency":"UN Industrial Development Organization","title":"World Manufacturing Production and Trade, 2026 Q1","date":"2026-06-30","kind":"Official statistics","url":"https://stat.unido.org/publications/qiip","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"UN Industrial Development Organization"},{"id":"NSF-SE-2026","agency":"National Science Board / NSF","title":"The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2026","date":"2026-05-04","kind":"Official research","url":"https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsbsep20261/overview","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"National Science Board / NSF"},{"id":"CENSUS-AIES-2026","agency":"U.S. Census Bureau","title":"Annual Integrated Economic Survey: Manufacturing Summary Statistics","date":"2026-02-26","kind":"Official data","url":"https://data.census.gov/table/AIESBASICTIMESERIES.AIES31BASIC01","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Census Bureau"},{"id":"GAO-CHIPS-2025","agency":"U.S. Government Accountability Office","title":"Semiconductors: Information on Projects Funded to Strengthen U.S. Supply Chain","date":"2025-12","kind":"Independent oversight","url":"https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107882","evidence_role":"independent_oversight","institutional_family":"U.S. Government Accountability Office"},{"id":"BIS-EAR-744-2026","agency":"U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security","title":"Export Administration Regulations, Part 744","date":"2026-07-27","kind":"Current regulation","url":"https://www.bis.gov/regulations/ear/744","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security"},{"id":"BIS-CHIPS-POLICY-2026","agency":"U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security","title":"Revised License Review Policy for Semiconductors Exported to China","date":"2026-01-13","kind":"Primary policy","url":"https://www.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-revises-license-review-policy-semiconductors-exported-china","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security"},{"id":"GAO-EXPORT-CONTROLS-2024","agency":"U.S. Government Accountability Office","title":"Export Controls: Commerce Implemented Advanced Semiconductor Rules and Took Steps to Address Compliance Challenges","date":"2024-12-02","kind":"Independent oversight","url":"https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107386","evidence_role":"independent_oversight","institutional_family":"U.S. Government Accountability Office"},{"id":"USGS-MCS-2026","agency":"U.S. Geological Survey","title":"Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026","date":"2026-05-27","kind":"Official data","url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/mcs2026","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Geological Survey"},{"id":"IEA-MINERALS-2026","agency":"International Energy Agency","title":"Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026","date":"2026-07-16","kind":"Intergovernmental analysis","url":"https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2026/executive-summary","evidence_role":"intergovernmental_data_or_analysis","institutional_family":"International Energy Agency"},{"id":"OECD-SECURITY-2025","agency":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","title":"Economic Security and Vulnerabilities in International Supply Chains","date":"2025-09","kind":"Intergovernmental analysis","url":"https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/09/economic-security-in-a-changing-world_78f3b129/full-report/economic-security-and-vulnerabilities-in-international-supply-chains_dc88aefa.html","evidence_role":"intergovernmental_data_or_analysis","institutional_family":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development"},{"id":"UNCTAD-MARITIME-2025","agency":"UN Trade and Development","title":"Review of Maritime Transport 2025","date":"2025-09-24","kind":"Official statistics","url":"https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2025","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"UN Trade and Development"},{"id":"WORLDBANK-LPI-2025","agency":"World Bank","title":"Connecting to Compete 2025: Logistics Performance Indicators 2.0","date":"2026-04-22","kind":"Intergovernmental data","url":"https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099042226142014971","evidence_role":"intergovernmental_data_or_analysis","institutional_family":"World Bank"},{"id":"MARAD-STRATEGY-2026","agency":"U.S. Maritime Administration","title":"Independent Study in Support of a National Maritime Strategy","date":"2026-03-23","kind":"Mandated study","url":"https://www.maritime.dot.gov/data-reports/independent-study-in-support-of-a-national-maritime-strategy","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Maritime Administration"},{"id":"GAO-RUSSIA-2025","agency":"U.S. Government Accountability Office","title":"Russia Sanctions and Export Controls: Agencies Should Establish Targets to Better Assess Effectiveness","date":"2025-09-08","kind":"Independent oversight","url":"https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107079","evidence_role":"independent_oversight","institutional_family":"U.S. Government Accountability Office"},{"id":"EU-ENERGY-2026","agency":"Council of the European Union","title":"Ending Russian Energy Imports","date":"2026-01-26","kind":"Primary policy and data","url":"https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/ending-russian-energy-imports/","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"Council of the European Union"},{"id":"IEA-GAS-2026","agency":"International Energy Agency","title":"Gas Market Report, Q1 2026","date":"2026 Q1","kind":"Intergovernmental analysis","url":"https://www.iea.org/reports/gas-market-report-q1-2026/executive-summary","evidence_role":"intergovernmental_data_or_analysis","institutional_family":"International Energy Agency"},{"id":"COMMERCE-IPEF-2024","agency":"U.S. Department of Commerce","title":"IPEF Agreement Relating to Supply Chain Resilience","date":"2024-02-24","kind":"Primary agreement","url":"https://www.commerce.gov/ipef/pillar-ii","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"U.S. Department of Commerce"},{"id":"PRC-NBS-2025","agency":"PRC National Bureau of Statistics","title":"Statistical Communiqué on China's 2025 National Economic and Social Development","date":"2026-02-28","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202602/t20260228_1962661.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC national statistics","language":"English (official translation)","primary_use":"Official aggregate data on industrial output, manufacturing, trade, research, energy, and investment.","limitation":"Official national aggregates can be revised and do not resolve product quality, defense usability, ownership, regional distribution, or causal attribution.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC National Bureau of Statistics"},{"id":"PRC-MIIT-SHIP-2025","agency":"PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology","title":"China's Shipbuilding Retained the World's Largest Market Share in 2025","original_title":"2025年我国造船国际市场份额继续保持全球领先","date":"2026-02-01","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.miit.gov.cn/gxsj/tjfx/zbgy/mycb/art/2026/art_fc5e4ed1d3f5421885e6c3afff91cbbc.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC industrial statistics","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official 2025 commercial ship-completion, new-order, and orderbook shares used to corroborate industrial scale.","limitation":"Commercial deadweight-ton and order measures do not establish naval complexity, quality, repair capacity, military conversion, workforce readiness, or combat effectiveness.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology"},{"id":"PRC-NEA-RENEW-2025","agency":"PRC National Energy Administration","title":"Grid-Connected Operation of Renewable Energy in 2025","original_title":"2025年可再生能源并网运行情况","date":"2026-02-12","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.nea.gov.cn/20260212/742b8c6a078347b0b39de676c05c5d58/c.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC energy statistics","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official renewable-capacity, additions, and grid-connection data used to assess power-system scale and growth.","limitation":"Installed and grid-connected capacity does not equal firm output, local deliverability, resilience, curtailment performance, or defense-usable supply.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC National Energy Administration"},{"id":"PRC-MIIT-PV-2024","agency":"PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology","title":"Operating Results of China's Photovoltaic Manufacturing Industry in 2024","original_title":"2024年全国光伏制造行业运行情况","date":"2025-02-27","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.miit.gov.cn/gxsj/tjfx/dzxx/art/2025/art_cf341b33d6ff4249baf36cd7b4068c75.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC industry reporting","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official output and export-volume reporting across polysilicon, wafers, cells, and modules.","limitation":"Reported production volumes do not establish yield, quality, profitability, ownership-adjusted control, inventory, or sustained output under disruption.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology"},{"id":"PRC-FYP14-2021","agency":"PRC State Council / National People's Congress","title":"14th Five-Year Plan and 2035 Long-Range Objectives","original_title":"中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要","date":"2021-03-13","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.miit.gov.cn/xwdt/szyw/art/2021/art_86371f315d484a36811c5c94298912fa.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC national development plan","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official objectives and priority sectors for industrial upgrading, semiconductors, AI, quantum, space, digital infrastructure, and supply security.","limitation":"A plan establishes policy direction and targets, not completed projects, qualified output, commercial viability, technology performance, or strategic effect.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC State Council / National People's Congress"},{"id":"PRC-IC-POLICY-2020","agency":"PRC State Council","title":"Policies to Promote High-Quality Development of the Integrated-Circuit and Software Industries","original_title":"新时期促进集成电路产业和软件产业高质量发展的若干政策","date":"2020-08-04","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.miit.gov.cn/xwdt/szyw/art/2020/art_b5059afaa450422a820648c635d653f6.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC industrial policy","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official tax, finance, research, talent, intellectual-property, and market-support instruments for semiconductors and software.","limitation":"Policy authorization and incentives do not establish disbursement, additionality, technological maturity, yield, qualified production, or control effectiveness.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC State Council"},{"id":"PRC-GACC-TRADE-2025H1","agency":"PRC State Council / General Administration of Customs","title":"Review of China's Foreign Trade in the First Half of 2025","date":"2025-07-14","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202507/14/content_WS68746e34c6d0868f4e8f421b.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC State Council publication of General Administration of Customs data","language":"English (official translation)","primary_use":"Official aggregate trade scale, direction, partner, and product reporting for the first half of 2025.","limitation":"Aggregate customs totals do not isolate strategic-product dependencies, value added, beneficial ownership, transshipment, coercive leverage, or crisis availability.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC State Council / General Administration of Customs"},{"id":"PRC-PBOC-RMB-2025","agency":"People's Bank of China","title":"RMB Internationalization Report 2025","original_title":"人民币国际化报告（2025）","date":"2025","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.pbc.gov.cn/huobizhengceersi/214481/3871621/5885243/2025122616492523798.pdf","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC central-bank report","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official reporting on cross-border RMB settlement, financial infrastructure, accounts, and international use.","limitation":"The report is an official program assessment; transaction use and infrastructure do not by themselves measure coercive leverage, convertibility, market depth, trust, or displacement of the dollar.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"People's Bank of China"},{"id":"PRC-BRI-2023","agency":"PRC State Council Information Office","title":"The Belt and Road Initiative: A Key Pillar of the Global Community of Shared Future","date":"2023-10-10","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/202310/10/content_WS6524b55fc6d0868f4e8e014c.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC policy white paper","language":"English (official translation)","primary_use":"Official BRI objectives, institutional architecture, geographic reach, and self-reported implementation claims.","limitation":"An official program narrative cannot independently establish project additionality, debt sustainability, host-state outcomes, strategic access, construction quality, or net coalition effect.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC State Council Information Office"},{"id":"PRC-MOFCOM-GA-GE-2023","agency":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs","title":"Export Controls on Gallium- and Germanium-Related Items","original_title":"商务部 海关总署公告2023年第23号 关于对镓、锗相关物项实施出口管制的公告","date":"2023-07-03","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/zcfb/dwmygl/art/2023/art_52b9a321087f402bb3d310d18b07967e.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC export-control announcement","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Controlled product scope, licensing requirement, legal basis, and effective date for gallium and germanium items.","limitation":"The rule establishes legal scope and stated intent, not licensing volume, realized export reductions, price effects, downstream shortages, or military allocation.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs"},{"id":"PRC-MOFCOM-REE-2025","agency":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs","title":"Export Controls on Selected Medium and Heavy Rare-Earth Items","original_title":"商务部 海关总署公告2025年第18号 公布对部分中重稀土相关物项实施出口管制的决定","date":"2025-04-04","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/jmxw/art/2025/art_a2284b3f7b8f4a59a6374f2009d5e36b.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC export-control announcement","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Controlled samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium forms, licensing requirement, and effective date.","limitation":"The rule establishes legal scope and stated intent, not license decisions, export volumes, market impact, supply interruption, or military allocation.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs"},{"id":"PRC-MOFCOM-GRAPHITE-2023","agency":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs","title":"Adjusted Export Controls on Graphite Items","original_title":"商务部 海关总署公告2023年第39号 关于优化调整石墨物项临时出口管制措施的公告","date":"2023-10-20","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://interview.mofcom.gov.cn/mofcom_interview/front/swfgk/article?id=20231003447368","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC export-control announcement","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Controlled natural and high-specification synthetic graphite scope, licensing process, legal basis, and effective date.","limitation":"The rule establishes legal scope and stated intent, not licensing volume, export realization, anode qualification, market impact, or supply interruption.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Commerce / General Administration of Customs"},{"id":"PRC-EXPORT-LAW-2020","agency":"National People's Congress of the PRC / PRC Ministry of Commerce","title":"Export Control Law of the People's Republic of China","date":"2020-10-17","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/zfxxgk/gkml/art/2020/art_76b5fa416a4c42afa8af295eefffdffc.html","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC law enacted by the National People's Congress and republished in full by the Ministry of Commerce","language":"Chinese","original_title":"中华人民共和国出口管制法","primary_use":"Statutory scope, authorities, end-use and end-user controls, control lists, temporary controls, and extraterritorial provisions.","limitation":"The law establishes authority and procedure, not how frequently powers are used, implementation quality, compliance, economic effect, or strategic outcome.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"National People's Congress of the PRC / PRC Ministry of Commerce"},{"id":"PRC-UEL-2020","agency":"PRC Ministry of Commerce","title":"Provisions on the Unreliable Entity List","date":"2020-09-19","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/dl/file/20211203230795.pdf","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC Ministry of Commerce regulation","language":"Chinese","original_title":"不可靠实体清单规定","primary_use":"Formal criteria, investigative process, and potential restrictions in China's Unreliable Entity List framework.","limitation":"Regulatory authority does not establish designation frequency, implementation consistency, firm adaptation, economic cost, or strategic coercive effect.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC Ministry of Commerce"},{"id":"PRC-AI-PLUS-2025","agency":"PRC State Council","title":"State Council Opinion on Deepening the 'AI Plus' Initiative","original_title":"国务院关于深入实施“人工智能+”行动的意见","date":"2025-08-26","kind":"Official PRC primary","url":"https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-08/27/c_1758018277755538.htm","source_origin":"PRC official primary","provenance":"Official PRC national AI policy","language":"Chinese","primary_use":"Official targets and implementation priorities for AI diffusion across science, industry, consumption, governance, and international cooperation.","limitation":"A policy program and future targets do not establish adoption, model quality, productivity gains, delivery timing, commercial viability, or military capability.","evidence_role":"official_primary_or_output","institutional_family":"PRC State Council"}],"counts":{"drivers":8,"cases":6,"indicators":16,"recommendations":8,"sources":37},"position_counts":{"partner":2,"mixed":4,"competitor":2},"current_through_display":"August 8, 2026"}